
For Immediate Release
Contact: Bert Hammond
September 6, 2007
(202) 225-7084
Lois Hill Hale
(323) 965-1422
House
Expresses Disapproval of Expulsion of Cherokee Freedmen
Watson: Amendment "Demonstrates the Gravity of the Issue . . . Additional Congressional Actions May Be Forthcoming"
During
the floor debate of H.R. 2786, Congressman Mel Watt (D-NC) offered an amendment
to prevent funds authorized under the act from being expended for the benefit of
the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma until it recognizes the Cherokee freedmen
descendants as citizens of the Cherokee Nation. Watt’s amendment was
further amended by language offered by Congressman Dan Boren (D-OK) that sets
aside Watt’s amendment as long as the tribe’s temporary injunction
reinstating the freedmen remains in effect and if the Cherokee freedmen prevail
in their appeal of Nation’s March 3 vote rescinding the tribal membership of
the Cherokee freedmen. Boren’s amendment, as well as Watt's original
amendment, passed by voice vote.
Congresswoman
Watson issued the following statement:
“The fact that the Cherokee freedmen issue has been raised on floor of the House of Representatives demonstrates the gravity of the issue. The amendment language clearly puts Congress on record that the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma will not be in compliance with the 1866 Treaty, which recognizes the freedmen as citizens, if it takes any action through its courts or otherwise to expel the freedmen descendants.
“The
amendment also sends a clear signal that Congress will continue to monitor the
situation closely. If the Cherokee Nation does not move expeditiously and
in a manner indicating it will comply with its treaty obligations, Congress is
poised to take stronger action.
During
the floor debate of H.R. 2786, Congressman Mel Watt (D-NC) offered an amendment
to prevent funds authorized under the act from being expended for the benefit of
the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma until it recognizes the Cherokee freedmen
descendants as citizens of the Cherokee Nation. Watt’s amendment was
further amended by language offered by Congressman Dan Boren (D-OK) that sets
aside Watt’s amendment as long as the tribe’s temporary injunction
reinstating the freedmen remains in effect and if the Cherokee freedmen prevail
in their appeal of Nation’s March 3 vote rescinding the tribal membership of
the Cherokee freedmen. Boren’s amendment, as well as Watt's original
amendment, passed by voice vote.
Congresswoman
Watson issued the following statement:
“I
remain very concerned and troubled by the conduct of the Cherokee Nation
leadership. The leadership’s rhetoric and actions indicate that it has
no intention of seeking any accommodation with the freedmen descendants.
It is my understanding that the Cherokee Nation has eliminated from its official
Web page all references on how freedmen descendants can apply for citizenship.
It has refused all outside requests for its current enrollment records of
freedmen descendants in the Cherokee Nation. And it pointedly refers to
freedmen as “non-Indians.”
Find
out more at the Congresswoman's official website: http://www.house.gov/watson/